top of page
Top image.png

Dr. Centeno's Academic Website


An academic website showcasing Dr. Centeno’s scientific publications, research history, and background. The webpage targets undergraduate and graduate students and scientists in the microbiology field.

The problem

The client reported a high bounce rate, a low engagement from students and other researchers, and a low article download per user. Our objective was to find out what was causing all these issues.

The client’s requirements

UX research and redesign into a more engaging webpage that stood out and incentivizes access and download of their scientific publications of relevance.

First step.png

UX Research

Initially, research was conducted to discover insights into the client’s problem. The aims here were to answer the big questions before exploring and defining the actual problems:

- Who is the exact target audience?

- What do they want?

- What is important to them?

- What they don't want?

- What information is mandatory for them?


Research Strategy

The first two steps were conducted to evaluate the current website and where it could be readily improved.

 What else do we need to know?.

Banner 1.png

Research Strategy

The roadmap below shows the structured UX research steps, the tools used on each step, and the timeframe that was spent on each step, and the whole process.




Metrics analysis

The metrics of the current website were evaluated using the numbers available in the WordPress dashboard.

It was verified that the users mainly stayed on the Homepage, not moving forward with the other sections, leading to a low number of publication downloads.


Heuristics Analysis

Why and how?

Heuristic how.png

What did we find?

There were many positive findings in the final completed website, however, a few usability issues were found which needed to be addressed.


Click here to view the full Heuristic analysis report

Competitor Analysis

Other academic websites that offer similar content (microbiology and mycology) were evaluated. We analyzed several aspects: features, usability, visual design, and others.

What methodologies were employed?

comp meth.png

What have we found?

We found that the client’s website had most of the features existent in the competition. However, the competitor’s websites were more organized and offered more value to the user.


Online Survey

A qualitative and quantitative questionnaire was created and surveyed among researchers and students. Seventeen users were surveyed in groups about microbiology and from indications by the client.

What did we want to understand?

Survey banner.png

What have we found?

Surevey results.png

The survey confirmed that:

- The majority of users have a higher degree;
- Users seek publications and research lines.


What were the new findings?
- The humane side of the researcher is also highly regarded by many users
- Most users are highly attracted by images of the micro-organisms they work with.

User Interviews

To follow the new findings obtained on the survey, we conducted exploratory interviews.

Scientists and people with a general interest in science and microbiology were interviewed.

The interviews provided excellent qualitative information and a deeper understanding of the findings discovered in the previous steps.


Definition and prioritization

The insights generated in the UX research process were grouped up and prioritized by affinity mapping in a brainstorm section.

Additionally, the “How Might We” technique was conducted and 2x2 Matrix was created.


The objective of these methods is to focus on the main problems to solve and how difficult it would be to work on each one.


Affinity Mapping


2x2 (Impact x Effort) Matrix

third step.png

Solutioning problems

The high-priority issues found in the previous steps were selected to be solved.

Ideation sections lead to the first sketches with potential solutions. These sketches served as a blueprint for the development of low-fidelity wireframes.



After the ideas were consolidated into the sketches, I further created low-fidelity interactive wireframes.

What were we testing with these wireframes?

wireframe banner.png

Through iteration, the wireframes were constantly validated with potential users to assure the solutions designed met the user’s needs.


High-fidelity prototype

After initial validation, more insights were gathered which led to tweaks in the current prototype.

Final changes were done and the high-fidelity prototype was again tested with users. The main objective was evaluating usability and similarity to real use.

Usability test.gif
step 4.png

After validation of the high-fidelity prototype, the final design was delivered to the client.

In summary, the website was completely redesigned.

A few sections were added to meet the user’s expectations and the existent sections were remodeled into a more interactive and engaging experience.

The webpage was also rebranded mainly by creating a simple logo and replacing the color palette.

What have I learned?

This project allowed me to further improve my UX research skills. I learned what types of questions to avoid asking users and the ones that brought me better insights.

Additionally, I improved drastically my prototyping and wireframing skills by being responsible for the creation of sketches, low and high-fidelity wireframes, and prototypes. I could see firsthand how powerful usability tests are in bringing to light what works and what doesn't in a website.

What most surprised me was the value that users put into the humane side of researchers. That meant that a website should not only show technical information but also inform the users on who are the people behind it.

Final Design

portfolio 1.jpg

Click below to view the final design:

bottom of page